BayouDiz66
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2013
I just completed another trip to the Fort last week. Beautiful as always. Many times now, we have come across people who are basically living at the Fort for several months, if not longer. I'm slightly upset by this. I know to Disney the money is the money and they don't care who they get it from, but I feel these long term residents are chewing up sites that regular vacationers could be using. I've found it harder and harder to find the dates and type that I'm looking for and can't help but think that this is partly why. Now, with "throw-away" sites and long-termer's, they're squeezing out the families who really can only make this trip once in a while. It just doesn't seem fair. Fort Wilderness was not designed to be a retirement community or a part-time residence. Is anyone aware of Disney's official stance on this?
I'm sure some folks will argue that if someone can afford it why shouldn't they, but I say that the opportunity for others who can only afford Disney by camping, or who must travel with pets is being severely limited by these others. I think there should be some sort of limit to these types of long term campers. What does everyone else think?
I'm sure some folks will argue that if someone can afford it why shouldn't they, but I say that the opportunity for others who can only afford Disney by camping, or who must travel with pets is being severely limited by these others. I think there should be some sort of limit to these types of long term campers. What does everyone else think?