WilsonFlyer
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
Can someone help me rationalize how DVC can allow everyone in every UY to return borrowed points for cancelled trips and not allow those of us that (through no fault of our own) have UYs outside our banking windows (April and June come to mind) to bank our points for cancelled trips?
Borrowing points was a conscious decision. In other words, everyone that borrowed points knew full well the potential ramifications of borrowing those points (or at least they should have). Those of us using our current UY points booking vacations at the end of our UY had absolutely no choice except to do what we did.
If the argument can be substantiated that allowing us to bank our points throws the system out of balance, I would contend that it no more throws the system out of balance than the violation of the rule that borrowed points can't be returned. The no return of borrowed points is equally part and parcel to the balance of the system. How is it any different?
Borrowing points was a conscious decision. In other words, everyone that borrowed points knew full well the potential ramifications of borrowing those points (or at least they should have). Those of us using our current UY points booking vacations at the end of our UY had absolutely no choice except to do what we did.
If the argument can be substantiated that allowing us to bank our points throws the system out of balance, I would contend that it no more throws the system out of balance than the violation of the rule that borrowed points can't be returned. The no return of borrowed points is equally part and parcel to the balance of the system. How is it any different?