Here is my contribution.
My pictures are not showing up??
here is the link http://www.flickr.com/photos/baylake/5118223096/
I found something interesting:
There is a design for a floating dock, which doesn't currently exist, under the drawing for a building, which doesn't exist. This is in the bottom left of the drawing, so it could be near the employee dock in RC.
Also, I noticed that the measured water levels were from '79 and '81. I suspect this drawing is from the original Cypress Lodge plans.
BTW, the blue box is labeled "fence" and the contours leading to it suggest the fence surrounds a culvert.
Here is my contribution.
My pictures are not showing up??
here is the link http://www.flickr.com/photos/baylake/5118223096/
Also, the dock at FW marina in this drawing is not at all like the existing dock. I'm curious if it is drawn according to how the dock looked in '82?
Very nice.
Notice how the new resort backs up nicely to RC.
It's coming back, folks.
It will be refurbished, but it's coming back.
Mark my words.
Lisa- That image is awesome!
Great job!
Is there any chance that you could post this on your website in a form that we could zoom in on things? Like on a PDF?
I'm glad you like it TCD! I was wondering if you would be looking for it too.
Some of the details on the pdf are great others are pretty poor though. Its also confusing the way it shows proposed things on top of the existing,
typically different line types are used to differentiate, but the way its shown it makes me think this is an Architects plan and not a detailed Engineer Site plan.
I wonder if the old wagons and playground are just shown because they were on the old linework or CAD file and haven't been updated. I figured out that's
the case near River Country, on this print it shows all the old stuff with the new buildings right over the top of it.
Check it out:
I don't know why your photo is not showing up.
It must be a broken link or something.
I hope you don't mind, but I screen-capped it.
It is a really good photo, and I'm sure others would like to see it:
Shan-man, those two docks can be seen at the far left.
Also, this photo helps me understand why I couldn't find the Fort Wilderness Pavilion on the drawing . . . it looks like it is just south of the area depicted in the drawing.
And- from this photo, it looks like I was wrong about the location of the Upstream Plunge pool. It is also south of where I thought it was. Are they going to try to refurbish it? It could be!
I agree with you here.
But, was the dock ever that short?
Maybe Google Earth has some old images?
I will check.
It does seem that way.
But, doubt it.
We will know when we see the rest of the plans.
TCD
OK, based on WBI's suggestion that existing improvements are shown on the drawing, I looked again for the big remaining pool, and the remnants of the Pop's Place restaurant.
I think this is it:
If this theory is true, then the Fort Wilderness Pavilion should be shown somewhere on the drawing, but I don't see it.
When I first looked at the part of the drawing shown above, I thought that it was the pool for the new resort. But, it also looks like there is a building around it. They have never enclosed a pool at any of the WDW resorts. So, maybe this is supposed to show where the remaining pool is now, and then the footprint of the new building.
So, where will the pool be for this new resort?
It has to have a pool, right?
TCD
Ahhh...how about a nice gentleman's wager? Say a nice pina colada at the Poly?
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't mind staying in a resort with this view.
TCD
The new aerial photo overlays posted by others have helped me to look at things differently.
WBI- what you have marked as a proposed sidewalks above is actually the existing boardwalk from River Country. You can see it here:
TCD
Hope this helps you out TCD, I displayed the plans over the photo for you.
Good old ArcGIS.
Speaking of view...I am wondering why the orientation of the proposed buildings doesn't take more advantage of the view of the MK? Only the end building really has a view in that direction. Does the CR and BLT block the best views from this point? I would think that the fireworks we enjoy from the beach would be visible from here.
Now, if you rotated the layout 90 degrees counter-clockwise you could give all rooms (lake side at least) a lake view and take more advantage of the MK views as well. It would also follow the contour of the lake shore a little better.
What is the bet?
But, I am not drinking a Pina Colada at the Poly.
Child please.
If we are betting, the drink will be consumed at Crockett's Tavern.
At good old Fort Wilderness!
And, mine will not have a paper umbrella.
Man's game.
TCD
Here's the bet:
I say River Country will back as follows:
- The original Whoop-'N-Holler body slides will be used
- The original tube ride will be used
- The Upstream Plunge pool will be used
- The Upstream Plunge slides will be used
- The rocks around Upstream Plunge and the body slides will stay
- The old swimming hole *may* be replaced with a traditional swimming pool
- The boom swing, tire swing, and zip line (or equivalents) will be used
- The park will be open to the public for a fee. DVC guests probably get in free
- The park will be named "River Country"
I am secure enough in my masculinity to drink a froo froo drink, umbrella and all! However, if the drink must be consumed at Crockett's, the winner chooses (within reason, of course).