DisneyAuntie12
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
This is kinda how FP+ worked in practice IMO. The more you paid, the better/easier time you had.
Pay the most by staying on site longer, get first dibs at those best/hard to get FP+s. You paid to sit at the Chef's table and get the best cut of steak.
Pay a lot, but not quite as much as the first group, by staying on-site for shorter got next crack to those FP+s. Your not at the chef's table but you're in the VIP lounge and we still likely have the best steak for you too, but maybe not. But that's ok too, we still have other really good cuts of steak for you too.
Then for those who paid the least by staying off-site you get some ok FP+s. You can still afford this restaurant, but you get chicken.
But don't fret, if you couldn't afford to pay to sit at the chef's table or in the VIP room, you too still have a way to get the best steak. You just should have reasearched better on how to get that best cut of steak. It's EASY to still get the best cut of steak. You just need to hover around the kitchen every ten minutes as the people who were at the chef's table may have decided to send their steak back even though they ordered it and you can have it now.
I'm going to stay with the 'time you wait for your meal' analogy because I think it's better at highlighting different intuitions than 'cut of steak'. I think people already very much accept that paying more money gets you filet mignon vs. rump roast. That difference will merit nothing more than a "Yeah... so?" in our society because it's totally normal for us. But I think the idea that a waiter would consciously bring some members of a party their meal half an hour before others is a bit "gasp-worthy" in our culture, and so better highlights the perspective of people who see paid FP as similarly gasp-worthy.
I think it's a fair point to say that this system was already unequal to an extent. But it was a pretty mild extent, so I think the analogy still holds. Staying longer at a Disney resort could be likened to putting in your takeout dinner order at noon and asking them to have it ready by 6:30 - with that much advance notice, yeah, it will probably happen a bit quicker for you than for the person who calls at 6:10. Staying offsite? Maybe akin to living 30 miles away from the restaurant vs. 5 miles away and asking for delivery. Yeah, there will be some differences, but those are expected. But when your waiter out and out serves your brother-in-law his meal and gives you a cold smile before walking off, breezily saying "Yours will be out in another 40 minutes or so."? That's a violation of our societal expectations of what is 'ok'.
Again, I'm not saying that's the analogy I'm going with. I'm genuinely kind of agnostic on this one. I will let the people speak for themselves when the new plan hits the shelves, ha ha! Just saying, I think looking at different analogies can highlight different perspectives.