sam_gordon
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
Yea. There's no way a politician can get his/her "say" out other than MSM.The never ending "news" cycle is why we do still need debates so that the other side can have their say.
Yea. There's no way a politician can get his/her "say" out other than MSM.The never ending "news" cycle is why we do still need debates so that the other side can have their say.
My favorite Nick Foles moment:Shouldn't have let Foles go, IMO.
Yes and no. Obviously, there are other avenues but the more exposure a candidate has, the better. And last night's debate has changed the scope of coverage a little on some subjects.Yea. There's no way a politician can get his/her "say" out other than MSM.
Not what PP claimed though. They claimed that without debates, one side wouldn't be able to "have their say". In this day of social media, live streaming, websites, among others, I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe that any candidate can't get their word out.Yes and no. Obviously, there are other avenues but the more exposure a candidate has, the better. And last night's debate has changed the scope of coverage a little on some subjects.
Is anyone actually still undecided at this point?
Besides neither one of them is going to tell us anything new, they repeat the same campaign talking points we've been hearing for months. You believe what your choice has to say, and you think the other guys is a liar.
Views of one particular side is getting just about everything removed or banned from main stream social media, streaming sites, etc. You have to work hard to get to obscure areas to find it vs. another side constantly being thrown in everyone's faces every time they open any social media, video sites, 90% of main stream cable news media, and even what is suppose to be funny comedy television shows on network and cable TV stations. I can't even watch a video from a Canadian about bushcraft and outdoors without being forced to have one side plastered on my TV before I can watch said video. Should I catch the 10% that is shown from the other side, I can easily skip past that after 3 seconds.Not what PP claimed though. They claimed that without debates, one side wouldn't be able to "have their say". In this day of social media, live streaming, websites, among others, I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe that any candidate can't get their word out.
I don't think there was anyone undecided 3 months ago. A friend and I recently discussed how we both heard some stat about 10% being undecided and how neither of us believed it.
If that's what you believe, ok. I won't say more so as not to take this "political". Have a good day!Views of one particular side is getting just about everything removed or banned from main stream social media, streaming sites, etc. You have to work hard to get to obscure areas to find it vs. another side constantly being thrown in everyone's faces every time they open any social media, video sites, 90% of main stream cable news media, and even what is suppose to be funny comedy television shows on network and cable TV stations. I can't even watch a video from a Canadian about bushcraft and outdoors without being forced to have one side plastered on my TV before I can watch said video. Should I catch the 10% that is shown from the other side, I can easily skip past that after 3 seconds.
It's still EDT and CDT. It doesn't change until 2AM Nov 1.The debate is on now. 9pm EST, 8pm CST