You have some fundamental misunderstandings...
My position is that:
- Longer contracts probably only save money if you intend to never sell and let the contract expire.
No. False. Longer contracts save money because you have the choice to re-sell at significant vale, or continue using.
If I want vacation lodging through 2042 -- If I buy a 2060ish contract, I can keep it until 2042 and then re-sell at significant value. If I buy a 2042 contract, it is worthless in 2042.
If I want vacation lodging through 2060 -- if I buy a 2060 contract, I keep it until expiration. If I buy a 2042 contract, then I have to ALSO buy another contract in 2042.
Either way, it's cheaper to buy the longer contract.
- Even then, dues matter more than the price per point. Aulani subsidized is going to be cheaper than Riviera despite shorter length.
The difference in dues outweighs the tiny difference in contract length. Aulani has another 39 years. Riviera has 47 more years. Riviera is only 20% longer than Aulani. Riviera is 147% longer than 2042 contracts. Not comparable situations.
- History suggests an inverse relationship between price and years left. BCV cheapest listing today is $6.36 per point per year left resale while Riviera is $2.67 resale. That is what I am getting at. BCV will likely be reselling for a higher price per point per year left in 2041 than Riviera will be.
No.
So let's illustrate -- It's January 2041, there are exactly 12 months until expiration.
There is a BCV contract is 100 points left on it.
Now, let's use 2022 prices. (there will be inflation... dues, rental rates, rack rates, will all be higher in 2041, but we use the 2022 prices as baseline).
So the buyer of that BCV contract will need to pay dues -- $753 in dues for that 100 point contract.
They will also have to pay closing costs -- $1,000.
So if they got the contract immediately, for "$0 per point" -- It would still cost them $17.53 per point.
But wait... the contract still has to go through ROFR. So they won't get it in January, they won't get it until March. At which point, they only have a 9 month window with which to book rooms. Everything might already be booked up by the time their contract clears ROFR!
But ok... let's say they are willing to take that risk. It's January 2041. They can rent points for $22 per point, at the 11 month window. Or they can buy points, that they won't be able to use until about 9 months. But let's say they are willing to buy points to save money vs renting. So they are willing to pay a total of $20 per point.
But... they are already paying $17.53 in dues and closing costs, per point. Meaning, maybe they would be willing to pay the seller ..... $2.50 per point.
So yes... in 2041, using current pricing, maybe that 100 point BCV contract could be sold for a grand total of $250. But even that's unlikely.
And the point is, as of January 31, 2042, the BCV contract becomes worthless. And it's really virtually worthless for the months leading up to that. And value will decline as we get closer.
There is absolutely no question that in 2037, the resale value of a 2060-2070 resort will be MUCH higher than a 2042 resort that only has 4 years left.
- So, in theory, selling BCV towards the end of the contract and buying another resale at a new resort with a lower price per point per year left would be the best financial move.
No... that's actually the most expensive option.
The very rough math -- A 100 point contract, BCV until 2042, then Riviera until 2070:
BCV - then buying RIviera in 2042 -- approximate total cost --$70,000
Buying RIviera now and keeping until 2070: Approximately $50,000