DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...-sets-off-mayhem-inside-paramount/ar-AA1nPdAX

A Media Heiress’s Bid to Sell Sets Off Mayhem Inside Paramount​

by Jessica Toonkel
April 28, 2024 - 7:27 pm EDT
by Jessica Toonkel

Shari Redstone was finally ready to cash out.

The media heiress who controls Paramount Global, owner of CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon and the Paramount film studio, last year started seriously contemplating selling the business.

She began to feel the pinch of the entertainment giant’s decline when management cut the dividend that has supplied income to the Redstone family for years. She showed friends photos of the house she was building in Turks and Caicos. The Oct. 7 attacks on Israel left her motivated to spend more time on fighting antisemitism, people close to her said.

So when David Ellison, the CEO of production company Skydance Media and son of billionaire Larry Ellison, raised the idea of a merger, Redstone was ready to hand over a media empire her family has controlled for nearly four decades.

If only it were that easy.

In the past few weeks, Redstone’s journey toward a deal has turned into one of the messiest merger dramas in memory, with the fate of an iconic American company—home of “Titanic,” “The Godfather,” and the “Indiana Jones” franchise—hanging in the balance.

Shareholders are rebelling over a proposed Skydance merger, bringing to the fore a central tension that has always been present in Paramount: what’s good for the Redstone family might not be as good for every other investor.

Meanwhile, tensions between Redstone and Paramount CEO Bob Bakish have reached a breaking point, and the company could announce as soon as Monday that it is parting ways with him, further clouding deal prospects. Paramount is expected to put in place an “Office of the CEO” made up of divisional heads for now.

Selling Paramount would be difficult enough even without all that turmoil, given how it has faded over the past several years. The collapse of the cable TV industry has hammered Paramount, and its struggle to find a profitable path in the new streaming world has only compounded its troubles. The company’s market value has plummeted by 80% on Redstone’s watch over the past eight years—dealing a multibillion-dollar blow to her family’s fortune.

Paramount has had chances to break up and divest its most attractive pieces over the years. Netflix and Apple, for example, showed interest in the Hollywood studio business, while former Showtime executives each offered hefty sums for the channel and Comcast was intrigued by a potential partnership in streaming, people familiar with those discussions said.

Though Redstone was open to some deals, like a Showtime sale, she held out hope that a big buyer—maybe a technology giant—would emerge to take the whole company off her hands, including fast-deteriorating cable channels. That didn’t happen.

“The hope for any company in this space is that Apple will come out and buy them, but that’s not a strategy,” said Robert Fishman, an analyst with MoffettNathanson.

Now Redstone is playing a weaker hand as the company explores its options. Paramount has been in exclusive talks with Skydance toward a deal that would net Redstone more than $2 billion in cash for National Amusements, the holding company that owns the family’s 77% voting stake in Paramount and a chain of movie theaters. Nonvoting Paramount investors would get stock in a newly merged company.

The current value of Redstone’s Paramount holding is about $750 million, meaning she would be getting a substantial premium in a Skydance deal. A battery of shareholders have gone public with concerns that it would be a sweetheart deal for Redstone. Skydance on Sunday proposed a revised offer, the details of which couldn’t be learned.

An independent board committee has been tasked with reviewing the Skydance deal. In a statement, National Amusements said it would respect the committee’s decision on “whether the Skydance deal presents an attractive transaction for Paramount and whether they want to continue to move forward.” National Amusements has signaled that it is open to making a transaction contingent on approval by a majority of non-Redstone shareholders, people close to the talks said.

Paramount has another potential option on the table. Private-equity giant Apollo Global Management submitted a $26 billion offer, including about $12 billion in equity plus assumption of debt. The board had concerns about Apollo’s bid, including whether it could arrange financing for a deal. Since then, Apollo has discussed teaming up with Sony Pictures on a potential bid.

An Apollo deal could be much more appealing to Paramount shareholders—giving them a cash payout—but wouldn’t give Redstone the hefty premium Skydance is offering.

Bakish has told people close to him he has concerns about the Skydance transaction. He and his management team worked to find an alternative with advisers including Aryeh Bourkoff, a power player in media who runs boutique investment bank LionTree.


Earlier this year, Bakish floated a plan to raise equity capital to buy out all voting shareholders in Paramount, including Redstone, according to people familiar with those discussions. This move would have allowed Redstone to cash out and would have collapsed the company’s dual-class share structure, creating equal footing for all shareholders. Redstone wasn’t interested in the idea, the people said.

In mid-April, Redstone and Bakish both attended the retirement party for Sean McManus, the chair of CBS Sports, at The Grill in New York City, mingling with the likes of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and former CNN chief Jeff Zucker. Bakish and Redstone barely spoke, one attendee said.

As the merger saga plays out, the business is in a pickle: the streaming operation, anchored by Paramount+, is growing swiftly, but posted $1.7 billion in losses last year. The TV business is shrinking, but continues to supply the lion’s share of the company’s profits. Paramount reports quarterly earnings Monday.

Paramount is in high-stakes negotiations to ensure carriage of its cable channels—among them Comedy Central, BET, MTV, VH1 and others—by cable giant Spectrum, with the current contract expiring at the end of April.

Paramount has begun planning for what would happen if no deal materializes. In recent days, top Paramount divisional heads presented a plan to cut more than $2 billion in costs while investing more in content, through selling CBS TV stations and cable network BET, and establishing a streaming joint-venture. The goal through those and other restructuring moves would be to slash Paramount’s roughly $14 billion in debt, people familiar with the presentations said.

A Reluctant Seller

Redstone, who turned 70 this month, fought a nasty battle to succeed her father, the irascible media mogul Sumner Redstone—vanquishing rival executives, nurses and his girlfriends along the way. She has a strong attachment to Paramount.

“Shari Redstone worked really hard to get the family business in her hands, so there must be a lot of personal tie-in to this whole endeavor,” said Tim Nollen, an analyst at Macquarie who has been bearish on Paramount for some time. “It’s easy to say you should have broken it up or sold, but maybe it wasn’t that easy with that in mind.”

As her father’s health deteriorated significantly by 2016, Redstone assumed the role of de facto boss of CBS and Viacom, the two separate companies in the family portfolio, which then had a combined worth of roughly $40 billion. Had Redstone sold her family stake in each company at that time, securing a premium similar to what Skydance is offering now, she would have walked away with more than $10 billion.

Viacom, once the darling of the Redstone holdings, was coming under major pressure as cord-cutting accelerated and its vast exposure to cable TV became a liability. In the five years through 2018, the company shed more than $25 billion in market value. CBS was comparatively stronger, bolstered by its high-rated broadcast network and rights to air NFL games.

When Shari Redstone pushed to reunite Viacom and CBS, she encountered resistance, with some warning her that the healthier CBS side could wind up damaged. “If one of your kids is sick, do you make them sleep in the same room or do you separate them,” one person involved in the deal recently recalled telling her at the time.

Redstone, who thought scale would help the company thrive in a Netflix-dominated media world, was undeterred and merged the two companies, forming what is now Paramount Global.


Redstone would have been better off if she had sold the entire company or pieces of it back when she took control, said Chris Marangi, co-chief investment officer at Gabelli Funds, which is Paramount’s second-biggest voting shareholder.

The CEOs of AT&T and Verizon each approached Redstone about buying CBS in the years before she pursued its merger with Viacom, but she declined.

“If she hadn’t merged the companies, it clearly would have been different,” Marangi said. “We would have all preferred 2019 prices for these assets.”

Even after Redstone reunited the media empire, offers for certain assets persisted.

Apple has expressed interest in the Paramount studio and toyed with the idea of buying the whole company to get it, according to people close to the situation. Similarly Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has expressed interest in buying the studio, but Redstone said it wasn’t for sale.

Showtime’s Billions

Redstone has complained about Bakish’s decision not to sell premium cable channel Showtime, say people close to her camp. The channel, an HBO rival, was known for high-quality fare such as “Dexter” and “Billions,” but it had an uncertain future in streaming, and rising production costs.

On Labor Day weekend 2020, former Showtime executive Mark Greenberg called Bakish, who was driving home to Connecticut and offered a deal that would leave Paramount with $3 billion in cash and a 25% remaining stake in the channel. Bakish declined, saying he had received larger offers in the past.

A few months later, in March 2021, Greenberg and investment giant Blackstone offered $5.5 billion to $6 billion in cash for Showtime, according to people familiar with the terms. Under the proposed deal, former Disney executives Kevin Mayer and Tom Staggs—who now run the entertainment company Candle Media—would have joined Showtime’s board.

Paramount’s top brass didn’t pursue the offer. A few years later, another offer for Showtime came in, a more than $3 billion bid from David Nevins, the former head of the channel. Bakish turned down the deal.

Rather than selling Showtime, Bakish convinced the board that the best course was to shut down Showtime’s streaming service and fold it into Paramount+, a move he said could save billions and improve the service’s outlook.

“There have been a couple of different times when you can look back and say, ‘coulda woulda shoulda,’” Fishman said. He said Paramount’s decision to put all its content into Paramount+ made selling off company parts more challenging, as entities such as Showtime were now tightly integrated into the service.

That wasn’t the only potential deal that got away. Cable and entertainment giant Comcast, led by longtime chief Brian Roberts, in 2021 inquired about joining forces with Paramount in streaming in the U.S., as the two companies were pursuing such a partnership in Europe. Bakish resisted, taking a view that putting Paramount’s new service, Paramount+, in a joint venture could further complicate selling the whole company, people familiar with the situation said.

Lately, Bakish has taken a different approach: Bakish and Comcast hashed out a potential partnership between Paramount+ and Comcast’s Peacock service, without keeping Redstone or the board updated, people familiar with the matter said. The deal could be structured in different ways—Comcast could license all of Paramount’s content, including its CBS Sports rights, and put it onto Peacock, or the companies could form a joint venture, with Comcast in control, said one of the people.

Redstone told people close to her the terms Bakish negotiation with Comcast were bad for Paramount and that such a partnership would complicate a larger deal with a suitor like Skydance.

Dividend Drama

Facing mounting pressures in its business, Paramount in May 2023 announced it was slashing its dividend by 79%, denting a key source of revenue for National Amusements.

Redstone expressed frustration to associates, saying she had let Bakish convince her that cutting the dividend would be good for the company and would help boost the stock, according to people familiar with the situation.

Redstone told associates she should have heeded a mantra favored by her late father, who died in 2020: hire great people, but don’t let them talk you into anything you don’t want to do.

Redstone’s company, National Amusements, which owns 124 theaters in the U.S. and abroad, was already struggling to recover from the pandemic when theaters around the country were temporarily closed, and it had amassed more than $300 million in debt. For financial help the company raised $125 million from a merchant bank. The company still has about $185 million in debt, a person familiar with the situation said.

Skydance’s Ellison came into the picture in summer 2023. Redstone and Ellison have known each other for years. They once had a dinner in Los Angeles that was arranged by her son-in-law Jason Ostheimer, who is also her partner at the venture-capital firm Advancit. Redstone and the younger Ellison would see each other at industry events over the years, and more recently, bonded over the importance of family legacy—both being the children of moguls. (Sumner Redstone died in 2020.)

In December, Ellison met with Redstone and her son, Tyler Korff, at her Connecticut home. Over lunch, Ellison described Skydance’s business, whose credits includes TV shows such as Amazon’s “Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan” and Apple TV+’s “Foundation,” and movies like “Top Gun: Maverick.” Skydance also has a sports joint venture with the NFL, an animation studio and a gaming division.

He laid out his vision: invest more in Paramount, restructure costs and improve Paramount’s data and analytics to better compete with Netflix. Redstone sent Ellison’s proposal to the board a couple of weeks later.

Tiny Skydancer

The deal itself would be structured in two steps. First, Skydance, which is backed by the Ellison family, and private-equity firms KKR and RedBird Capital Partners, would buy out National Amusements. Then, Paramount would acquire Skydance with stock at a valuation of $5 billion.

The valuation has turned heads since the Journal first reported on Skydance’s financials. The company’s expected revenue this year of just over $1 billion is one-thirtieth of Paramount’s and it is expected to generate earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of $90 million. The Hollywood labor strike last year has weighed on many studios, including Skydance, but the company expects a surge in 2025 to $2.29 billion in revenue and $322 million in Ebitda.

Under the proposed deal, Skydance would put more than $1.5 billion in cash onto Paramount’s balance sheet, say people familiar with the terms. Former NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell, now a RedBird executive, would be president under Ellison.

Amid the deal talks with Skydance, a board shake-up occurred, with four directors—three of whom were on the independent committee, stepping down. Redstone had wanted a smaller, more nimble board for some time, people familiar with the situation said. The directors were told they would not be up for renomination. At least one, Nicole Seligman, an attorney and former Sony Entertainment executive, questioned the Skydance deal, the people said.

If the deal collapses, Redstone will likely pursue a sale of just National Amusements, without trying to merge Paramount into another entity, said people close to her.

Paramount is trying to carry on business as usual: as the TV world’s annual advertising sales bonanza gets under way in New York, its top executives are hosting a series of dinners this week with Madison Avenue titans at the Chelsea Factory.

Write to Jessica Toonkel at jessica.toonkel@wsj.com
 
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/skydance-revises-paramount-offer-3-163352945.html

Skydance Revises Paramount Offer With $3 Billion Cash Infusion to Allay Shareholder Worries
by Lucas Manfredi
Mon, Apr 29, 2024, 11:33 AM CDT

David Ellison’s Skydance Media has made a revised offer for Paramount Global in an effort to assuage minority shareholders’ concerns as the two parties’ exclusive talks are set to expire on May 3.

An individual familiar with negotiations tells TheWrap that the new offer includes a $3 billion cash injection as well as premium sweetener for a percentage of non-voting Class B shares.

The two-step deal would see Skydance acquire the company through controlling shareholder Shari Redstone’s stake in National Amusements, which owns 77% of Paramount voting stock. The second step would see Skydance and Paramount merge to create a combined company valued at around $5 billion. Under the new terms, Redstone, who is already set to get a premium for her shares, could take less cash and keep more equity in Paramount under one scenario being discussed.

Representatives for Paramount and Skydance declined to comment. A spokesperson for National Amusements and Redstone did not immediately return TheWrap’s request for comment.

The new terms come as a number of investors have expressed opposition to the Skydance deal, including Matrix Asset Advisors, Ariel Investments, Aspen Sky Trust and Blackwood Capital Management.

Ariel’s founder and chairman John Rogers Jr., whose firm had a 1.8% stake in Paramount as of the end of 2023, and GAMCO Investors Inc. chairman and CEO Mario Gabelli, who owns 5 million voting shares, have also both previously warned that they could pursue litigation if the Skydance deal or any other bid does not appropriately benefit their clients.

In addition to Skydance, Apollo Global Management made a $26 billion all-cash offer, which was reportedly rebuffed due to concerns around the financing of its bid. The private equity firm has since entered talks with Sony about potentially making a new joint bid, though no offer has formally been made.

Paramount is slated to report its earnings results for the first quarter of 2024 after the bell on Monday. Analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research expect the company to report earnings of 34 cents per share on revenue of $7.68 billion.

Additionally, Paramount Global CEO Bob Bakish is expected to exit his role, two insiders told TheWrap on Saturday. According to The Wall Street Journal, Paramount will establish an “Office of the CEO,” composed of the company’s division heads, to replace Bakish on an interim basis.

Bakish’s departure follows news earlier this month that four members of the board — including three who were on the independent special committee evaluating bids — would not seek reelection at Paramount’s June 4 annual meeting.
Shares of Paramount, which are up more than 3% during Monday’s trading session, have climbed 12% in the past six months but are down 47% in the past year and 14% year to date.

The post Skydance Revises Paramount Offer With $3 Billion Cash Infusion to Allay Shareholder Worries appeared first on TheWrap.
 
https://variety.com/vip/survey-netflix-ad-plan-20-million-us-subscribers-harrisx-1235983888/

April 29, 2024 6:00am PDT
by Tyler Aquilina
Survey Suggests Netflix Ad Plan May Have More Than 20 Million Subscribers in U.S.

If the plan for Netflix’s ad tier was to follow a “crawl, walk, run” progression, as the company’s CFO once put it, the business now seems to be walking at a healthy clip.

Results from the latest quarterly streaming survey by HarrisX, shared exclusively with Variety Intelligence Platform, show that Netflix’s ad-supported tier is, as of the end of Q1, the second most common subscription plan for the service among U.S. households of the four tiers Netflix offers.

Out of more than 9,600 U.S. Netflix subscribers polled, 27% were on the “Standard with ads” plan, behind only the “Standard” plan — the cheapest ad-free tier currently on the domestic market — at 32%.

These results suggest adoption of the ad plan has accelerated significantly since it launched to muted results about a year and a half ago. It’s unclear how many users currently subscribe to the plan worldwide; Netflix has never revealed exact subscriber counts for the AVOD tier and has not disclosed any figures since announcing in January that it had surpassed 23 million global monthly active users.

But based on rough extrapolation from these survey results, around 22 million users may now exist in the domestic market alone. Netflix had about 82.7 million subscribers in the U.S. and Canada at the end of Q1, per its earnings report for the quarter; 27% of that figure is about 22 million.

There are caveats to this estimate, of course — the HarrisX survey covered only the U.S., not Canada, for instance — but it’s not an unreasonable ballpark for the ad plan’s domestic user base.

The U.S., after all, is Netflix’s largest single-country market, and “Standard with ads” is available in only 11 other countries worldwide: the U.K., Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico and Spain.

And if we assume the AVOD tier has maintained its November-to-January growth rate — the ad plan had 15 million monthly active users at its one-year anniversary last November — its global total would now stand at more than 30 million, or around 11% of Netflix’s subscriber base. Not too shabby, considering the ads business is less than two years old.

Its upward potential also remains significant. According to the HarrisX survey, as of Q1 nearly 20% of U.S. subscribers were still on the ad-free “Basic” plan, for which Netflix discontinued new subscriptions last summer. The streamer is already at work on eliminating that tier entirely in some markets, “starting with Canada and the U.K. in Q2 and taking it from there,” as the company’s Q4 ’23 shareholder letter noted.

The question, of course, is how many users will be lost versus how many will migrate to the ad-supported plan once the Basic tier is eliminated. Given Netflix’s success at converting many non-paying users through its password-sharing crackdown, however, it’s logical to assume eliminating the Basic plan would be a net benefit for the company.

Furthermore, Netflix’s penetration in the U.S. remains lower than one might think, given the streamer’s seeming omnipresence in the cultural landscape. While more than half of households subscribe to the service among every age bracket, penetration remains below 70% for all but one demographic — ages 25-29, per the HarrisX survey.

The ad plan will be a key tool for further expansion, particularly as growth from the password-sharing crackdown begins to ebb. But while the crackdown has primarily been viewed as a short-term growth strategy, it could work in tandem with the AVOD tier as a long-term engine: As younger users exit their parents’ households, for instance, they will be forced to begin paying for their own subscriptions and may find the ad-supported plan appealing as a low-cost option.

In short, Netflix’s push into ads is beginning to manifest the true potential it always possessed, despite its slow start. And of course that’s good news for a business shifting from a high-growth model to a long-term, slow-growth one that will be increasingly reliant on ad revenues.

As the streamer reorients its focus to prioritize engagement rather than subscriber growth, advertising will only become more vital to its business model, with time spent on the AVOD tier driving revenue. If these survey results are any indication, user growth is more or less on rails at this point, and boosting engagement should indeed be priority number one.
 
https://ir.paramount.com/static-files/788ef7dd-d093-4fb6-9e4a-43a81169eb41

PARAMOUNT REPORTS Q1 2024 EARNINGS RESULTS
« Paramount+ Increased Revenue 51% Year-Over-Year and Reached More Than 71 Million Global
Subscribers
« Direct-To-Consumer Adjusted OIBDA Improved Year-Over-Year for the 4th Consecutive Quarter
« Total Advertising Revenue Rose 17%; Total Company Revenue Increased 6%
« Generated $260 Million of Net Operating Cash Flow and $209 Million of Free Cash Flow in Q1
 


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/29/business/media/paramount-bob-bakish-steps-down.html

With Paramount in Chaos and Its Future Uncertain, Its Chief Steps Down

Bob Bakish was once a staunch ally of Shari Redstone, Paramount’s controlling shareholder. His departure comes as the company considers a major merger.

By Benjamin Mullin and Lauren Hirsch
April 29, 2024 - Updated 5:46 p.m. EDT

Shari Redstone, the owner of Paramount, has tried to resist the erosion of her media empire over the last decade as she confronted the death of cable TV, the rise of streaming and even a failed boardroom coup from a longtime ally.

By her side through it all has been Bob Bakish, Paramount’s chief executive. For years, she saw him as a loyal lieutenant who could navigate the treacherous entertainment industry with the financial dexterity of the management consultant he once was. As Paramount’s share price sagged, she was patient with him — even as she steered the company toward an eventual sale that he had reservations about.

That patience officially ran out on Monday.

Mr. Bakish is stepping down effective immediately, Paramount announced on Monday, a stunning shake-up in the top ranks of the company as it considers a major merger.

Mr. Bakish, 60, will be replaced by an “office of the C.E.O.” run by three executives: Brian Robbins, head of the Paramount movie studio; George Cheeks, chief executive of Paramount’s CBS division; and Chris McCarthy, chief executive of Showtime and MTV Entertainment Studios.

Looming over Mr. Bakish’s exit are broader questions about the future of Paramount. Like many media companies, Paramount has struggled in recent years to get its streaming business off the ground as audiences for its cable channels have diminished. As a result, it has long been considered an acquisition target by rivals looking to build up their content libraries and increase their leverage in cable negotiations.

In recent months, the company has been in discussions to merge with Skydance, a media company run by the tech scion and Hollywood executive David Ellison. Ms. Redstone, who is Paramount’s controlling shareholder, has already signed off on a potential deal for her stake, but the company’s directors have yet to reach an agreement for the whole company.


Several shareholders have come out publicly against a combination with Skydance, saying it would enrich Ms. Redstone at the expense of other investors. The private equity firm Apollo Global Management and Sony have discussed making an all-cash bid for Paramount, an offer that could give the company a serious alternative. But any talks with other suitors must wait until the exclusive negotiation period with Skydance lapses, in early May.

In an effort to assuage those concerns, Skydance sweetened its proposal in recent days. The company told Paramount that it would provide a $3 billion cash infusion to pay down debt and buy back shares, money that would come from the private-equity firm RedBird Capital and the Ellison family. Skydance also offered to give Paramount shareholders a larger stake in the combined company than it previously contemplated.

It is unclear if Skydance’s sweeteners will be enough to convince the special committee of board members evaluating the merger with Skydance that the deal treats all shareholders fairly. The rare nature of Mr. Bakish’s departure could put extra pressure on the committee to show they’re negotiating the best deal for shareholders, said Jim Woolery, founder of Woolery & Company, an advisory firm.

“It creates a point of leverage,” said Mr. Woolery, who has advised many special committees. He said it was now more likely that the special committee would open up deal talks with Apollo and Sony or consider allowing rival bidders to step in after any deal with Skydance is signed and giving Skydance the right to match a higher offer.

Mr. Bakish has been an employee of Paramount since 1997, and he and Ms. Redstone have been allies for years. He took over as chief executive in 2016 after a rift opened between the Redstone family and one of his predecessors, Philippe Dauman, and Mr. Bakish was her preferred candidate to run the company after it merged with CBS in 2019.

But Ms. Redstone’s relationship with Mr. Bakish began deteriorating over the last year, three people familiar with their interactions said. Ms. Redstone perceived he had missed opportunities to strike lucrative deals for the company, including a sale of its Showtime and BET cable networks, they said. In 2021, the private equity firm Blackstone expressed interest in acquiring the Showtime cable network for at least $5.5 billion, an eye-watering sum for a business in long-term decline, one of the people said. Paramount did not pursue that deal.

The Wall Street Journal earlier reported on Blackstone’s interest in Showtime.

Mr. Bakish is in line for a big payday. According to the data firm Equilar, he is entitled to a severance package of $50.6 million, with $31 million of that in the form of cash for the two years after his employment is terminated.

Ms. Redstone came to believe that Mr. Bakish wasn’t moving with enough urgency to get Paramount on firmer footing, the three people said. Mr. Bakish also told the special committee this year that he had reservations about the company’s merger with Skydance, one of the people said.

Mr. Bakish’s position became untenable in recent weeks after he presented a long-term plan to the special committee that Ms. Redstone believed did not adequately reflect the input of the company’s top executives, including Mr. Robbins, Mr. Cheeks and Mr. McCarthy, the three people said. Ms. Redstone approved discussions between those executives and representatives of the board, including Charles Phillips. During the conversations, the executives expressed misgivings about the direction of the company, the people said.

Mr. Bakish’s departure marks the end of an important chapter in Paramount’s history. He was a pioneer of a strategy to offer streaming entertainment directly to consumers, creating the Paramount+ streaming service and acquiring Pluto TV, a free, ad-supported streaming service.

Mr. Bakish had an unlikely path to the top of Paramount. A former consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton, he joined Viacom, Paramount’s predecessor, after advising Paramount Communications on strategy for its Madison Square Garden division. Mr. Bakish rose to become head of Viacom’s international channels division, and was tapped in 2016 to succeed Tom Dooley as chief executive.

He got the top job during a perilous time for Viacom. The company’s bellicose approach to negotiations with cable companies — its most important partners — resulted in its being dropped by the Suddenlink cable system in 2014. Viacom’s share price tumbled. Mr. Bakish took a more measured approach to negotiations, improving the relationship with cable providers and stabilizing the company.

Despite those efforts, Paramount’s share price has continued to sink over the years, reflecting investors’ skepticism about the cable TV business. Over the last year, the price has fallen 48 percent as the cable bundle — once an industry-defining juggernaut — continues to lose subscribers.

After more than a quarter-century at the company and its predecessor, Mr. Bakish’s send-off from Paramount was unceremonious. In brief remarks at the end of the company’s first-quarter earnings call, Paramount’s chief financial officer offered his former boss terse congratulations on navigating “a number of challenges.”

He did not take any questions.

Benjamin Mullin reports on the major companies behind news and entertainment. Contact Ben securely on Signal at +1 530-961-3223 or email at benjamin.mullin@nytimes.com. More about Benjamin Mullin

Lauren Hirsch joined The Times from CNBC in 2020, covering deals and the biggest stories on Wall Street. More about Lauren Hirsch
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertain...to-steal-nba-rights-away-from-tnt/ar-AA1nSQhp

NBC Prepares Roughly $2.5 Billion a Year Offer to Steal NBA Rights Away From TNT
League is in advanced stages of a new round of media-rights deals; Disney’s payments would increase under proposed deal

By Joe Flint, Amol Sharma and Isabella Simonetti
April 29, 2024 - 5:55 pm EDT

Comcast’s NBCUniversal is prepared to pay an average of about $2.5 billion a year to air a package of National Basketball Association games, as rival Warner Bros. Discovery makes last-ditch efforts to keep those rights, say people familiar with the situation.

Warner’s TNT is one of the league’s oldest TV partners and has paid an average fee of $1.2 billion under its current deal. Warner was unable to reach a new pact with the NBA before an exclusive negotiating window expired last week, which allowed NBC to make a bid.

The package NBCUniversal is bidding on would include playoff and regular season games that would appear on the NBC network, as well as its Peacock streaming service. NBC has discussed carrying two prime-time games per week, something Warner can’t offer because it does not own a broadcast network.

Sports rights are coveted assets for both traditional media companies fighting to keep cable subscribers and streamers trying to attract and retain customers. The league’s discussions with partners for the new round of media-rights deals—which would kick in after the 2024-2025 season and last about a decade—are in the advanced stages.

Disney, the parent of ESPN and ABC, is the other major TV partner and is expected to pay an average per-year fee of about $2.6 billion to renew its deal, the people familiar with the situation said, up from about $1.5 billion per year now.

Each TV partner would air fewer games under their new deals than under the current pacts. The league took some games away from its TV partners during this year’s rights negotiations in order to create a new package for a streaming partner. Amazon’s Prime Video has already reached the outlines of a streaming rights deal with the NBA.

The league’s negotiations with its streaming and TV partners are fluid, and the parties are still haggling over who gets rights to air the most high-profile games and series. Amazon is likely to get a share of the Conference Finals alongside the other partners, and Disney’s ABC is on track to retain the rights to the NBA Finals, some of the people said.

Warner’s TNT has the ability to try to match rival offers, people familiar with its pact said.

For Warner, the loss of the NBA would be a blow to the strength of its TNT cable network at a time when it is already being hurt by cord-cutting and a shrinking advertising marketplace. TNT still has a heavy roster of sports including the NCAA March Madness college basketball tournament, the NHL and Nascar, but without the NBA, Warner could have a harder time charging distributors as much for carriage of its channels.

Warner Chief Executive David Zaslav has emphasized cost savings and had indicated on calls with analysts that while securing NBA rights is important, the company would be disciplined in its approach to a new deal.

If Warner loses NBA rights, that would injure the planned sports-streaming venture the company is launching alongside Disney and Fox. Carrying NBA games was to be one of its key selling points.

Write to Joe Flint at Joe.Flint@wsj.com, Amol Sharma at Amol.Sharma@wsj.com and Isabella Simonetti at isabella.simonetti@wsj.com
 
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/b...le-skydance-charter-carriage-deal-1235885769/

Paramount’s New “Office of the CEO” Has a Big First Task: Not Letting CBS Go Dark With Charter

The details matter on the potential deal with the cable company, as the new pact could affect the value of Paramount and therefore its takeover price target.

by Georg Szalai
April 29, 2024 - 2:05pm PDT

As a buyer group led by David Ellison’s Skydance Media aims to iron out a potential deal to take over Paramount Global, many eyes on Wall Street are also watching carriage talks between the entertainment conglomerate and cable giant Charter Communications. On April 30, that deal expires.

Last year, Charter played hardball with Disney in a negotiating showdown that led to a brief blackout last fall before the companies struck a broad carriage deal covering traditional pay TV networks and streaming services, which finance experts called a blueprint for future sector agreements and a potential “tipping point” in the relationship between content and distribution giants.

Depending if, when, how, and what Charter and Paramount agree on in a new pact could affect the value of Paramount and therefore its takeover price target and its strategic positioning for the future. It’s no surprise then that industry observers have their eyes and ears peeled for signs of how it will play out.

Chris McCarthy, George Cheeks and Brian Robbins are now in charge, making up an “Office of the CEO” and running Paramount on a day-to-day basis for now. So all eyes and ears are also on them.

“Charter took a hard stance against Disney in September despite adverse timing (during the beginning of NFL/CFB seasons) despite that ESPN had yet to double-dip,” Wolfe Research analyst Peter Supino highlighted in a recent report. “Neither of these factors will benefit Paramount, whose streaming service can be purchased at a cheaper rate (with all its marquee sports) than Charter currently pays for its portfolio of network.”

LightShed Partners analysts Richard Greenfield, Brandon Ross and Mark Kelley had already warned in March of potentially rough seas in the Paramount-Charter and other carriage talks.

“While we doubt Paramount ends up being dropped, we expect very challenging renewals as it has become far less important to distributors to carry Paramount, given how little content is exclusive to the legacy multichannel bundle,” the LightShed team argued. “And while Paramount+ may be included in any distributor renewal, it will likely lead to a significant reduction in what distributors pay for existing Paramount networks to prevent double paying for content.”

And given that Paramount has a vast array of cable channels tethered to the linear pay TV ecosystem that’s declining, negotiations could get tough. “Operators may balk at the price tag for MTV2 during the next round of carriage negotiations given the network is not seen as a must-have for subscribers in today’s world where consumers have a vast array of digital video options,” S&P Global Market Intelligence analyst Scott Robson wrote about Paramount in a report after the Disney-Charter deal was unveiled last year.

Paramount Global CEO Bob Bakish, whose exit from the company was made official Monday, “made plans to focus its attention on six ‘core brands’ in 2017, before the CBS and Viacom merger,” the analyst added. “Since then, the company has kept its niche networks on air, but that might be changing.”
 


https://ca.movies.yahoo.com/sports/news/fox-disney-warner-tap-streaming-142000373.html

Fox, Disney, Warner Will Tap Streaming Sports Venture in TV Upfront
Brian Steinberg
Mon, April 29, 2024 at 9:20 a.m. CDT

The three media companies planning to launch a much-scrutinized sports streamer later this year are set to give advertisers a sneak peek at the new outlet.

Fox, Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery plan to use their new streaming joint-venture — the official name of the video hub has yet to be announced — to boost the impressions they have to sell to Madison Avenue during the industry’s annual “upfront” market, according to three people familiar with the matter. Each company will offer to use the audiences expected to watch the programs they contribute to the new business — and the national commercials that accompany them — to fill out advertiser schedules, these people say. The companies could also insert ads as needed in the feeds if need be, one of these people suggested.

Fox, Warner Bros. Discovery and Disney declined to provide comment on their plans. During the upfront, TV networks try to sell the bulk of their commercial inventory for their next cycle of programming.

While many aspects of the new service remain unknown, revelation of the aforementioned plans suggests that advertising will play a role. Many streaming services show significantly fewer commercials than their linear-TV counterparts, but the new streaming outlet is expected to offer access to networks including ESPN, TNT, ABC, Fox and Fox Sports 1, all of which rely on commercials as a significant pillar of their finances.

The price of the service is to be announced at a later date, but the companies will likely set a monthly subscription that is more than a consumer would pay for a standalone regional sports network, which costs $20 to $30 per month, and less than a larger digital programming package such as Hulu + Live TV or YouTube TV, which cost around $75 to $80 per month, according to a person familiar with discussions.

The new outlet is expected to launch in the fall as the NFL season gets underway.

The plans also hint at the growing reliance traditional media companies have on sports to generate the big audiences upon which TV advertisers still rely. To be sure, more ad plans use proprietary data and programmatic buying to align commercials with specific pockets of consumers — expectant mothers or first-time auto buyers, for example — but big marketers still like to reach broad swaths of potential customers all at once, which remains a more efficient practice. Live sports broadcasts are among the few TV properties that continue to do that.

Sports are likely to play a key role in this year’s upfront. One media-buying executive familiar with early discussions between advertisers and TV networks suggests media owners may use sports to offset some of the declines expected in other parts of the business. In other words, this executive says, TV companies may use impressions from sports audiences as a means to shore up ratings declines in primetime, daytime or late-night schedules.

One challenge, of course, is that the number of people who plan to subscribe to the new joint-venture streamer is, for now, unknown. The companies have suggested the sports outlet will appeal to a generation of customers who no longer subscribe to traditional cable, but will find the sheer number of sports hours offered a compelling prospect.
One of the goals of the new business is to generate some of the revenue Disney, Fox and Warner Bros, Discovery are, like their contemporaries, losing as one-time TV viewers gravitate more readily to streaming on demand. The hope is that the new sports streamer replaces some of the distribution revenue the companies are losing as one-time subscribers get their content elsewhere. As the upfront plans reveal, perhaps there is also room to bolster ad revenue too.

The three media companies have tapped Peter Distad, a former executive at Apple TV, to serve as the new venture’s CEO. While at Apple, he worked to expand usage of the Apple TV app and the Apple TV+ video service, as well as Apple’s distribution of games from Major League Soccer.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!





Latest posts







facebook twitter
Top