Phicinfan
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2014
Martin at WDWMagic.com is inferring now that there may be no GotG in WDW. Not sure why, and he can't expand right now.With that said GOTG can still be used in WDW as well as doctor strange.
Martin at WDWMagic.com is inferring now that there may be no GotG in WDW. Not sure why, and he can't expand right now.With that said GOTG can still be used in WDW as well as doctor strange.
He said maybe. Things have been back and forth on GOTG.Martin at WDWMagic.com is inferring now that there may be no GotG in WDW. Not sure why, and he can't expand right now.
That is what has me concerned. This came up to light a few weeks ago, and now that he has stated ONE option else, makes me think things have changed again. Just my opinion on what I have read.He said maybe. Things have been back and forth on GOTG.
ToT is one of the greatest rides disney as ever done.
you and your "sources" don't seem to be doing all that well.....
Per multiple insiders, and Chapek, himself ToT is safe in WDW.
we have one insider with solid history from WDWMagic.com that states WDW may not get GotG at all now, that any marvel push in WDW could be held off, he can't expand on why yet.
Amen to that! They're doing it down the street and that's more than enough for me. There's more than enough Disney IP to fill all 4 parks and then some and why they don't use DISNEY branding is beyond me. No faith in their own product? I'm surprised there was no talk of a Tangled overlay in TOT. While I'm not a fan of changing and would rather see "added to", I could get behind that more that GoG. I'll duck from the tomatoes now. lolPersonally I have no desire for Marvel in any of the current 4 parks.
I doubt Guardian is a big enough brand to get an entire land.
I'm going to guess that more than a few people said the same thing about Avatarland....
Yep and I was one of them. lol I still don't understand it, but I'm just happy to have something new to do at AK so I'll take it.....Though I would have much rather seen them expand on their OWN IP rather than doing something that would be a much better fit at IOA. I don't really think it matters so much how much money a film pulled in, those of us going to WDW get pretty excited about seeing Disney films come to life no matter which ones they are. Why Tarzan and Jungle Book aren't there are beyond me....Nemo? I just don't get it. They could have easily made an entire land of The Lion King but noooo....let's use this random movie. lol I'll never understand their thinking but I'll continue to fork over my hard earned dollars. lol I need a tattoo that says, "SUCKAA!"I'm going to guess that more than a few people said the same thing about Avatarland....
Yep and I was one of them. lol I still don't understand it, but I'm just happy to have something new to do at AK so I'll take it.....Though I would have much rather seen them expand on their OWN IP rather than doing something that would be a much better fit at IOA. I don't really think it matters so much how much money a film pulled in, those of us going to WDW get pretty excited about seeing Disney films come to life no matter which ones they are. Why Tarzan and Jungle Book aren't there are beyond me....Nemo? I just don't get it. They could have easily made an entire land of The Lion King but noooo....let's use this random movie. lol I'll never understand their thinking but I'll continue to fork over my hard earned dollars. lol I need a tattoo that says, "SUCKAA!"
If they probably won't happen why post them?I'm doing great and my rumors are based on behind closed doors info. So they probably won't happen, but there's always a possibility.
Also I don't really care what wdwmagic posters have to say.
Yes it does and that's exactly why me no likey! lolI agree. They have a lot of IP of their own that they could really build upon. I was disappointed they didn't continue with the "Lands" theme (Asia, Africa) etc... and do a land based on Australia or South America - think of what they could have done with the Rain Forests, wonderful conservation opportunities there. I mean, I've seen enough photos and read enough reviews now to know that sure, I'll really enjoy Avatarland, but I'll always feel like they missed the mark a bit. We would have far rather seen them create a beautiful land based on the very real beauty of what exists on our earth, instead of some sort of Sci-Fi thing (does Avatar count as Sci Fi? lol).
If they probably won't happen why post them?
If you want to be known as credible you need to discuss things that are very possible.
But those things are all vastly known. Carsland in Epcot is just crazy IMO and Guardians was looked at for DHS but determined as a no 6+ years ago.It is Disney, most things they develop won't be created.
Roger Rabbit Section (at DHS)
Muppets Section w/ Great Muppet Movie Ride (DHS)
Dick Tracy's Crimestoppers (DHS)
Beastly Kingdom (DAK)
Cars Land (DHS)
Monsters Inc Door coaster (DHS)
Disney America
etc, etc, etc,
But those things are all vastly known. Carsland in Epcot is just crazy IMO and Guardians was looked at for DHS but determined as a no 6+ years ago.