usnuzuloose
Loosing Boo Boo
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
that is very sad I hope it's not due to this case.
It is a fact the jury could not convict according to the prosecution's evidence or Casey would have been found guilty.
It is a fact that many people are assuming because they feel or they think Casey is guilty that the jury made the wrong decision.
Objection overruled.
I wonder if she will get her job back at Universial!
*
Rie'smom-
Everything was pointed to Casey Anthony. Not reporting a child missing for 31 days is a fact. She should have at the very least been convicted of some kind of child abuse or neglect. What "normal" loving mother would NOT report a 2 year old baby missing? This is child neglect, and a fact and she should have been convicted at least on that charge. But too many things pointed to Casey Anthony. The stench from her car (the smell of a decomposed body), the duct tape, the heart shape sticker, the lies on the jail video tape (which contradicts the defense), the lying of where she worked, the lying of a nanny, the lying of where her daughter was. What mother in their right mind would tell the police and parents and lawyers that she (the baby) was KIDNAPPED!? It's disgusting. She was digging herself in a hole. I would have convicted her. Like I said if it was one or two things that pointed to her but it was a whole laundry list that pointed directing to her. She's guilty in my opinion.
Isn't Scott Peterson in jail for killing his wife and unborn child? I thought they didn't know how he killed her even though they found her? I didn't think they had to prove how the child/person was killed
Ok, I lied
Are any of the charges she was found guilty of a felony?
Much harder to get a job with a felony conviction.