Doingitagain
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2006
I just looked at Jambo on the DVC site, and it looks like the block is removed. It is showing a lot of available and some "not available" rooms.
I just looked at Jambo on the DVC site, and it looks like the block is removed. It is showing a lot of available and some "not available" rooms.
Thank you!!! I was just able to snag a room for 5 days in November that I have been stalking (for any resort) for a while. Moved my August trip. Would have preferred a different room type, but I'll take it!They've opened reservations back up for AKV - Jambo. Tons of availability through end of year. Hope it's not a glitch.
Maybe they'll end up opening Jambo after all. They just moved me from a value to a standard at Kidani, but now my same dates are available at Jambo value?!?
I had an All-Star Sports reservation for 7/20 for one night prior to my 5 nights at BCV and 5 at BLT, and when I saw that Jambo was now taking reservations, I jumped in and grabbed 2 value studios for me and my parents for that night instead! I had 6 banked points, and had to buy 18 OTU points, and with that, I was able to get the value accommodations at AKL for $12 CHEAPER than All-Star! This is the first time I used my own DVC to book a reservation...now all I have to worry about is getting into parks and the governor lifting the 14 day quarantine for the tri-state area! What can go wrong?!?!
You probably really did yourself a favor if the rumor about value resorts not reopening in July holds true!
Because they are not changing room status...they are moving and taking that room out of service,
To me, it is a big difference, For me, it would be making up rules as to how to reclassify a CL room without it being in the POS...which could be there and then it’s a moot point.
The point I was making is that they could take CL rooms out of service legally if they want to and so far, I haven’t seen anything to suggest they can’t.
I believe they own points at the resort for this exact reason...so if open room becomes unavailable then they move to one that is.
Again, I am not saying they will...just that I think they can legally take them out of service, Just as they had to the values when the floor was closed due to hotel renovations.
Sorry but I don't see any backing for what you're stating. And it makes things worse point wise. As mentioned there is nothing in the unit declarations themselves that they will be anything in particular. They could (and have) given rooms on the 5th floor to those who were booked CL.
We are talking about five 2 bedrooms whose points are built with CL levels. Not offering that service and booking them as something else IS reclassifying them temporarily as a different type of room-and I see nothing that gives them the authority to do that.
Indirectly, they would be adjusting the points charts and booking those rooms as a different category
So yup, unless someone can provide me with something from the POS that deals with this, I believe then can take 5 2 bedroom lock offs out of service.
We can agree to disagree, Again, I never said they would, but that they can open Jambo and decide not to fill those rooms if they want.
I emailed Terri Schultz last night about lack of room availability at Jambo- and this is what I rec'd in return...
"Thank you for your note, and your feedback. It looks like we were experiencing a technology issue and the Jambo House inventory was not appropriately displaying. As you might imagine during these past weeks we have been juggling a lot of system updates to keep up with all the closures, openings and more, and it appears this issue slipped through. It is now fixed, so you should now see available inventory at Jambo House."
Apparently inventory can go missing from the RAT for multiple days and DVC doesn't notice? Whatever....
Apparently inventory can go missing from the RAT for multiple days and DVC doesn't notice? Whatever....
does she have a pubic email we can contact?Ha, I agree... thats a big Whatever...
yuppers... I’m not a POS guru by any means, but we were one of the first AKV members (names still on the quilt thing).I decided to take a look at the AKV declaration documents. The 6th floor units when added to the association do not have any special designation referenced in the drawings filed nor the documents filed at that time. The Initial AKV documents of course reference the Concierge Lounge and that only designated Concierge rooms will have access. So far I haven't run across them designating what rooms even though it was logical it would be the rooms on that floor.
As has been mentioned in the past the Concierge lounge is actually a limited common element reserved for use by the Concierge units. WDWHRC (aka - AKV hotel side) was given an easement to use the lounge and shares the expense. They can terminate that agreement at which time all expenses would be DVC. If they do that then DVC has the right to allow other owners to access the lounge for a fee to be decided upon by DVC or DVC can "discontinue the provision of concierge services from the Concierge Lounge provided that the Concierge Lounge will continue to be open and available to Owners staying in the Concierge Units".
------------------------------------------
One other interesting section is 12.12.1 of the Declaration of Condominium for AKV: The Vacation Ownership Plan and Home Resort Reservation component has a statement where it says (paraphrasing) - it is the express intent that all units committed to the Vacation Ownership plan will be available for use by all owners at all times (based on first come first served etc).
-----------------------------------------
Lastly of note - there's a reference that DVC has the fiduciary responsibility to the association alone and not to any associated entities. ie - they must operate for our best interest and not to accommodate The WDW company.
And that's all I've got left on the subject.
I don’t think they are club level rooms
yuppers... I’m not a POS guru by any means, but we were one of the first AKV members (names still on the quilt thing).
Our deed was at Jambo, and there was no lower percentage of ownership if you owned one of the “units” that included the sixth floor. If those*rooms* had a higher value, the percentage would have been lower given the same amount of points purchased.
Does that make sense?